Skip to main content

Why Most Quarantine Art Is Just ‘Empty Heroics’ + Two Other Illuminating Reads From Around the Web

Each week, countless articles, think pieces, columns, op-eds, features, and manifestos are published online—and not a few of them cast new light on the world of art. I pick out a few each week that might inspire some larger discussion.

"'Artists in Quarantine,' Public Intellectuals, and the Trouble With Empty Heroics" by Jörg Heiser, Art Agenda

The director of the Institute for Art in Context at Berlin's University of the Arts issues a withering critical assessment of the cultural response to the coronavirus crisis so far.

Heiser is talking about the "Artists in Quarantine" project from a bunch of European museums, sponsoring "modest" balcony-based art performances that are meant to be shared via social media to spark "conversation about the effects of the current pandemic." These Heiser considers pretty thin.

But he also takes the moment to damn a variety of cultural figures, including the philosopher Giorgio Agamben, whose (widely condemned) reaction to Italy's lockdown was to describe the measures as expressions of authoritarian "governmentality," and so to undermine the public health message about the need for widespread self-isolation.

The link between these very different types of response—one sentimentally affirming the need to isolate, the other a rejection of it—may not be obvious. For Heiser, the connecting thread is that both fall back on a cliché of the intellectual as society's truth-teller rather than asking how the new situation challenges how they operate:

All of these examples beg the question of why artists and intellectuals pay lip-service to social causes or, worse, promote stale concepts of the free-spirited intellectual who heroically dissents from the petit-bourgeois majority and their lemming-like submission to in-the-closet Hitlers. The answer is simple: because not doing so would require them to admit to themselves and others an unsettling sense of existential insecurity. That is hard to do, so the typical panic reaction has been to rehash preconceived notions to fit new circumstances.

The "existential insecurity" in question, in case it's not clear, is not the very literal existential fear of COVID-19. It's the sense that a crisis so widespread and urgent makes contemporary art or cultural theory feel small, possibly irrelevant in the face of more pressing emergencies.

Even before the crisis, so much of the sense of staticky emptiness around contemporary art or art writing could be traced to the fact that, in the vast majority of cases, the ultimate underlying raison d'etre was not that something had to exist, as the expression of some deep underlying system of belief or passion. Instead its deep motivation was just that new product, new programming, new content had to be produced to justify a space, day in day out, to stay ahead because that's what the logic of the whole rickety system demands. You get a lot of hot air to keep a broken balloon from deflating—and the quantity of hot air is a direct expression to how little room there is to pause without crashing.

In so many even more tragic ways, the COVID crisis serves to both make visible and inflame problems that were already festering. What Heiser diagnoses as "empty heroics" seem another illustration of that same larger pattern.

"Art After the Future" by James McAnally and Andrea Steves, March Cover for <em>March</em>. Image courtesy March.

Cover for March, October 2020.

McAnally formerly was one of the publishers of the socially engaged St. Louis-based Temporary Art Review. He and collaborator Sarrita Hunn are returning to launch the new "journal of art and strategy" March, a title which, among other things, is meant to frame it as a sequel to venerable theory magazine October (the first issue "occupies" both the crisp red-white-and-black design and claims to reanimate the original mission of October).

In "Art After the Future," McAnally and Andrea Steves (an artist and one of the founders of the Museum of Capitalism) issue a kind of manifesto that doubles as an attempt to size up this crisis moment in art. It actually shares something with Haider's diagnosis, condemning how the "moving assembly line of deadlines and mechanics of alienated hyper-productivity are at odds with pause, silence—or illness." All the frantic motion forestalls the unsettling work of thinking through the implications of the break that the present represents:

As we take a step (and then the next), as we allocate our time, attention, stimulus checks, ourselves to the tasks on their way we must also ask: What forms of slowness or non-functioning should we preserve from this time? What do we learn from our own sudden emptiness? Inertness? Alertness to our limits? What institutions are worth supporting? What practices are worth preserving? What work is worth making?

"Just Being" by Risham Majeed and Blake Bradford, Art Journal The National Museum of African American History and Culture. Courtesy Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of African American History and Culture Architectural Photography.

The National Museum of African American History and Culture. Courtesy Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of African American History and Culture Architectural Photography.

Two critic-scholars parse the stories told about black history via images, objects, art, and architecture at the National Museum of African American History in Washington, DC and Culture and the Equal Justice Initiative Museum and Memorial in Montgomery, Alabama. It's a long, thorough, and thoughtful accounting, worth reading all the way through for how carefully they balance pointing out the importance of little details with a powerful sense for what is left out.

I wouldn't try to sum up every interesting point here, but a comment by Majeed about halfway through serves as an overall statement of purpose:

[T]he one thing I wouldn't want to do is devise a new set of standards for histories that have been marginalized. I want the same rigor, otherwise with such exceptionalism there is a risk of it remaining marginal and becoming trite. That's not to say that there shouldn't be alternative sets of questions.

Follow artnet News on Facebook:Want to stay ahead of the art world? Subscribe to our newsletter to get the breaking news, eye-opening interviews, and incisive critical takes that drive the conversation forward.


Popular posts from this blog

History of Art Timeline

The historical past of art is usually told as a chronology of masterpieces created during each civilization. It can thus be framed as a narrative of high culture, epitomized by the Wonders of the World. On any other hand, vernacular art expressions can even be integrated into art historic narratives, called folk arts or craft. The more intently that an art historian engages with these latter sorts of low culture, the much more likely it is that they will determine their work as analyzing visual culture or cloth culture, or as contributing to fields associated with art historical past, akin to anthropology or archaeology. In the latter cases, art gadgets may be called archeological artifacts. Surviving art from this era comprises small carvings in stone or bone and cave painting. The first traces of human-made gadgets appeared in southern Africa, the Western Mediterranean, Central and Eastern Europe Adriatic Sea, Siberia Baikal Lake, India, and Australia. These first traces are general…

How to Show Art Work when the Gallery Says No Thanks

There are places in the town where you live where you can show your artwork when the big gallery you solicited said, "No, thanks."
Other artists may need to find venues other than galleries to show their artworks as well. Visual artists living in art-rich communities where there is a lot of local competition will need to get creative about display opportunities.

Or on the other hand, in towns without large art venues, it is important for artists to find smaller and less obvious places to show your art.

How to Show Art Work When The Gallery Says No Thanks

1. Show Where You Go

The most successful approach to finding a place in your town to display your artwork is to solicit a place that you go to frequently. Make a list of all the places you go to each day, each week, and each month.

Make a special trip, or the next time you visit note if the establishment currently exhibits any artwork, if it is local, and if it is for sale.

Also note if they have available wall space where a…

Watch: This Crashing Wave Art Installation in South Korea Brings Seaside Tranquility to a Busy City

Salvador Dalí was one of the most famous painters of the 20th century. The Surrealist's self-promotional antics and bizarre artwork made him an international celebrity early in his career, and there are still traces of him littered throughout pop culture. References to the melting clocks in his most famous painting, The Persistence of Memory, have cropped up on everything from The Simpsons to news coverage of the 2015 New England Patriots's Deflategate scandal. His distinctive personal style is now so iconic that he has become a Halloween costume—one instantly recognizable by mustache al one.The artist's long career was full of unexpected twists, and even if you've seen his work, you probably don't know how far-reaching his influence remains today, more than a century after he was born on May 11, 1904. 1. Salvador Dalí started painting when he was just a kid. Dalí painted one of his earliest known works, Landscape of Figueres, in 1910, when was about 6 years ol…